From bac409bc0a49981600d44bdb8ed21ddda1094c69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lingdocs <71590811+lingdocs@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 20:17:35 +0500
Subject: [PATCH] clarify that its just masc

---
 src/content/inflection/inflection-patterns.mdx | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/content/inflection/inflection-patterns.mdx b/src/content/inflection/inflection-patterns.mdx
index f0979ef..47c9a7d 100644
--- a/src/content/inflection/inflection-patterns.mdx
+++ b/src/content/inflection/inflection-patterns.mdx
@@ -122,10 +122,10 @@ These words are a little irregular but you can see a common patten based around:
 
 <details>
 <summary>
-<strong>Note</strong>: <strong>Animate nouns</strong> in this pattern will often only use the first inflection for the plural.
+<strong>Note</strong>: <strong>Masculine nimate nouns</strong> in this pattern will often only use the first inflection for the plural.
 </summary>
 
-For example, if we put a singular (animate) word <InlinePs opts={opts} ps={{ p: "پښټون", f: "puxtoon" }} /> in a sandwich, most of the time people will not inflect it.
+For example, if we put a singular masculine animate word <InlinePs opts={opts} ps={{ p: "پښټون", f: "puxtoon" }} /> in a sandwich, most of the time people will not inflect it.
 
 <Examples opts={opts}>{psmd([
     {