From 7490220d47441a29dd0121628c315e09225e86f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lingdocs <71590811+lingdocs@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 17:51:08 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] fix

---
 src/content/phrase-structure/ep.mdx           | 15 +--------------
 src/content/phrase-structure/kids-section.mdx |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/content/phrase-structure/ep.mdx b/src/content/phrase-structure/ep.mdx
index daaef81..3b6d0c7 100644
--- a/src/content/phrase-structure/ep.mdx
+++ b/src/content/phrase-structure/ep.mdx
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ import EquativeIllustration from "../../components/EquativeIllustration";
 import BasicBlocks from "../../components/BasicBlocks"
 
 
-**There is no "to be" verb in Pashto**. 🤯 Let that sink in for a second. There's no infinitive "to be" form. You can't say "It's good *to be* here."  We can't use "to be" as a verb and make normal verb phrases like we do in other language.
+**There is no "to be" verb in Pashto**. 🤯 Let that sink in for a second. There's no infinitive "to be" form. You can't say "It's good *to be* here."  We can't use "to be" as a verb and make normal verb phrases like we do in other languages.
 
 In Pashto, we use a special structure called an **equative phrase (EP)** when we talk about something being something.
 
@@ -34,21 +34,8 @@ Notice how the word order is different than it is in English.
 There are two ways to build an equative phrase:
 
 1. <Link to="/phrase-structure/np/">NP</Link> + <Link to="/phrase-structure/ep/#whats-an-ep-complement">Complement</Link> + Equative
-    
-    <BasicBlocks large blocks={[
-        { bottom: "NP", inside: "A", top: "Subject" },
-        { bottom: "Comp.", inside: "B", top: "Predicate" },
-        { bottom: "Equative", inside: "=" },
-    ]} />
- 
 2. <Link to="/phrase-structure/np/">NP</Link> + <Link to="/phrase-structure/np/">NP</Link> + Equative 
 
-    <BasicBlocks large blocks={[
-        { bottom: "NP", inside: "A", top: "Subject" },
-        { bottom: "NP", inside: "B", top: "Predicate" },
-        { bottom: "Equative", inside: "=" },
-    ]} />
-
 The equative will **always agree with the last NP** in the phrase. So for #1 it will agree with the *subject* and for #2 it will agree with the *predicate*.
 
 ## 1. NP + Complement
diff --git a/src/content/phrase-structure/kids-section.mdx b/src/content/phrase-structure/kids-section.mdx
index b888686..84bf764 100644
--- a/src/content/phrase-structure/kids-section.mdx
+++ b/src/content/phrase-structure/kids-section.mdx
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ In Pashto we have a bunch of little words that we will treat like little **child
 <ul>
     <li>The emphatic <InlinePs opts={opts} ps={{ p: "خو", f: "kho" }} /> particle</li> 
     <li>The <InlinePs opts={opts} ps={{ p: "به", f: "ba" }} /> particle</li>
+    <li>The jussive <InlinePs opts={opts} ps={{ p: "دې", f: "de", e: "may" }} /></li>
     <li><Link to="/pronouns/pronouns-mini/">Mini-pronouns</Link>:</li>
     <ul>
         <li><InlinePs opts={opts} ps={{ p: "مې", f: "me", e: "1st pers sing" }} /></li> 
@@ -42,7 +43,6 @@ In Pashto we have a bunch of little words that we will treat like little **child
         <li><InlinePs opts={opts} ps={{ p: "مو", f: "mU", e: "1st/2nd pers plur" }} /></li> 
         <li><InlinePs opts={opts} ps={{ p: "یې", f: "ye", e: "3rd pers" }} /></li>
     </ul>
-    <li>The jussive <InlinePs opts={opts} ps={{ p: "دې", f: "de", e: "may" }} /></li>
 </ul>
 
 These little words/particles can't run around anywhere in the sentence. **They have to stay in the kids' section**. They're not allowed to go anywhere else! 🙅‍♂️