From 61a5db06bdcb5264cdf32fd16221f4e375fca82d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lingdocs <71590811+lingdocs@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 21:32:46 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] up

---
 src/content/verbs/past-verbs.mdx | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/content/verbs/past-verbs.mdx b/src/content/verbs/past-verbs.mdx
index 42902a3..10d81ba 100644
--- a/src/content/verbs/past-verbs.mdx
+++ b/src/content/verbs/past-verbs.mdx
@@ -103,11 +103,11 @@ The continuous past uses the <i className="fas fa-video" /> **imperfective root*
 
 ## Past tense with transitive verbs 😵
 
-Here's where things get interesting. <Link to="/phrase-structure/vp/">Remember</Link>, with non-past tense transitive verbs the *subject* is always the <KingIcon /> of the phrase, leaving the servant <ServantIcon /> role to the object. But **with past tense transitive verbs, the roles are reversed!** With past tense transitive verbs in Pashto:
+Here's where things get interesting. <Link to="/phrase-structure/vp/">Remember</Link>, with non-past tense transitive verbs the *subject* is always the king <KingIcon /> of the phrase, leaving the servant <ServantIcon /> role to the object. But **with past tense transitive verbs, the roles are reversed!** With past tense transitive verbs in Pashto:
 
-- The **object** is the <KingIcon /> **king** of the phrase
+- The **object** is the **king** <KingIcon /> of the phrase
     - The *object* commands the verb!
-- The **subject** is the <ServantIcon /> **servant** of the phrase
+- The **subject** is the **servant** <ServantIcon /> of the phrase
 
 Also, another weird thing that happens is that the **subject** is inflected.