From 8130793346df1717c7b51ecae643ed35352a80f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lingdocs <71590811+lingdocs@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:59:13 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] oops
---
.../blog/pashto-verbs-master-chart/index.mdx | 38 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/content/blog/pashto-verbs-master-chart/index.mdx b/content/blog/pashto-verbs-master-chart/index.mdx
index be07876..85992e0 100644
--- a/content/blog/pashto-verbs-master-chart/index.mdx
+++ b/content/blog/pashto-verbs-master-chart/index.mdx
@@ -830,13 +830,10 @@ There's a *very* small handful of verbs where multiple ingredients are irregular
]}
-
-
-
- See conjugations
+
{[
[
{
@@ -888,17 +885,12 @@ There's a *very* small handful of verbs where multiple ingredients are irregular
},
],
]}
-
+
-
-
-**NOTE**: The لاړ in the perfective stem will inflect depending on the gender of the subject. For example, I woman will say, "زه لاړه شم?" while a man will say "زه لاړ شم?". (subjunctive)
-
-
- See conjugations
+
{[
[
{
@@ -956,7 +948,9 @@ There's a *very* small handful of verbs where multiple ingredients are irregular
},
],
]}
-
+
+
+**NOTE**: The لاړ in the perfective stem will inflect depending on the gender of the subject. For example, I woman will say, "زه لاړه شم?" while a man will say "زه لاړ شم?". (subjunctive)
So far our formula is holding up well. it holds true for all kinds of different verbs. But will it work with compound verbs too? Yes, it will!
@@ -964,21 +958,29 @@ So far our formula is holding up well. it holds true for all kinds of different
For compound verbs there's a very important set of auxillary verbs. These are extremely common in Pashto, and yes, they continue to follow our formula. They are also the only words we see that have irregular past participles.
+##### کول - kawul (to make)
+
+##### کېدل - kedul (to become)
+
+##### کول - kawul (to do)
+
+##### کېدل - kedul (to happen)
+