diff --git a/content/blog/pashto-compound-verbs/index.mdx b/content/blog/pashto-compound-verbs/index.mdx
index d97d5be..3d5f1fd 100644
--- a/content/blog/pashto-compound-verbs/index.mdx
+++ b/content/blog/pashto-compound-verbs/index.mdx
@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ For instance, if you have a sentence or a clause with the verb <IW w={{ p: "کا
 
 #### They use <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawul", e: "to do" }} />
 
-While stative componuds used <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawul", e: "to make" }} />, dynamic compounds use <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawul", e: "to do" }} />. These may look like the same verb, but they're not! They mean different things, behave differently, and in the perfective forms they diverge.
+While stative compounds used <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawul", e: "to make" }} />, dynamic compounds use <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawul", e: "to do" }} />. These may look like the same verb, but they're not! They mean different things, behave differently, and in the perfective forms they diverge.
 
 <table
     className="table table-bordered"
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ Let's look at the verb <IW w={{ p: "کار کول", f: "kaar kawul", e: "to work
 
 #### The words always stay seperate
 
-With dynamic componuds, the complement and verb *never ever* get fused together. For example <IW w={{ p: "کار کول", f: "kaar kawul" }} /> can never get squished together to become <IW w={{ p: "کارول", f: "kaarawul" }} />. In fact, <IW w={{ p: "کارول", f: "kaarawul", e: "to use" }} /> is actually a completely different non-componud verb.
+With dynamic compounds, the complement and verb *never ever* get fused together. For example <IW w={{ p: "کار کول", f: "kaar kawul" }} /> can never get squished together to become <IW w={{ p: "کارول", f: "kaarawul" }} />. In fact, <IW w={{ p: "کارول", f: "kaarawul", e: "to use" }} /> is actually a completely different non-compound verb.
 
 #### There can't be any other objects!
 
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ Remember all those weird different behaviours that we mentioned at the beginning
 
 Some verbs can be used either as stative or dynamic compounds. For example, with <IW w={{ p: "استري کول", f: "istree kawul", e: "to iron", a: "" }} />, you could either use it as:
 
-- a stative componud
+- a stative compound
     - as in "to iron ____" (to make something ironed)
 - a dynamic compound
     - as in "to do ironing" (to do the activity of ironing)
@@ -1074,13 +1074,13 @@ There is also an *intransitive version* of these machines, for when you are just
 
 ...but are not mentioning the person or thing that's *doing* the action.
 
-### Instransitive stative componuds
+### Instransitive stative compounds
 
 <img src={stativeCompoundIntransitive} />
 
 These follow all the same rules and behaviours as the transitive versions, except that there's only a subject, and no object.
 
-These verbs use the intranisite equivalent to <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawúl", e: "to make" }} /> which is <IW w={{ p: "کېدل", f: "kedúl", e: "to become" }} />.
+These verbs use the intranisitive equivalent to <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawúl", e: "to make" }} /> which is <IW w={{ p: "کېدل", f: "kedúl", e: "to become" }} />.
 
 <RootsAndStems
     info={getVerbInfo({"i":10313,"ts":1581086654898,"p":"کېدل","f":"kedul","e":"to become _____","c":"v. intrans. irreg. stat.","ssp":"ش","ssf":"sh","prp":"شول","prf":"shwul","pprtp":"شوی","pprtf":"shúwey","noOo":true})}
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ These verbs use the intranisite equivalent to <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawúl",
 
 Notice how with this verb, just as with <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawúl", e: "to make" }} />, there is no <IW w={{ p: "و", f: "óo", e: "perfective prefix" }} />.
 
-All these compounds will have the same characteristics as the tranisitive "transformer machines" that we saw earlier. The only difference is that there's no subject pressing the button and doing the action of transforming. There's just a subject that goes through and is changed.
+All these compounds will have the same characteristics as the transitive "transformer machines" that we saw earlier. The only difference is that there's no subject pressing the button and doing the action of transforming. There's just a subject that goes through and is changed.
 
 <img src={becomingSadDiagram} />
 
@@ -1520,13 +1520,13 @@ Here are the intransitive versions of all the other examples above:
     </tbody>
 </table>
 
-### Intranisitive dynamic compounds
+### Intransitive dynamic compounds
 
 If a dynamic compound is made with <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawul", e: "to do" }} /> then you can also make an intransitive version of it with <IW w={{ p: "کېدل", f: "kedúl", e: "to happen", a: "" }} />. This way you will be talking about an action happening, without mentioning who was doing it.
 
 <img src={dynamicCompoundInransitive} />
 
-The verb used is <IW w={{ p: "کېدل", f: "kedúl", e: "to happen", a: "" }} />, which is the intransitive equivalent of <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawul", e: "to do" }} />. It *does* ake a <IW w={{ p: "و", f: "óo", e: "perfective prefix" }} />
+The verb used is <IW w={{ p: "کېدل", f: "kedúl", e: "to happen", a: "" }} />, which is the intransitive equivalent of <IW w={{ p: "کول", f: "kawul", e: "to do" }} />. It *does* take a <IW w={{ p: "و", f: "óo", e: "perfective prefix" }} />
 
 <RootsAndStems
     info={getVerbInfo({"i":10312,"ts":1527812754,"p":"کېدل","f":"kedul","e":"to happen, occur","c":"v. intrans. irreg. dyn.","ssp":"وش","ssf":"óosh","prp":"وشول","prf":"óoshwul","pprtp":"شوی","pprtf":"shúwey","diacExcept":true})}